A Growing ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: The Way Prosperity and Deprivation Now Sit Cheek by Jowl in England.
In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, inhabitants occupy homes just a few metres from their wealthier neighbours in nearby Scartho. A six-foot-tall wall literally separates the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off paths and streets that once connected them.
“It’s the posh-poor divide,” remarked a resident, aged 37. “It has been there since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to associate with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Data from government figures shows the extent of inequality often exists, sometimes over little more than a short distance of tarmac, a hedge row or a wall. Decades of austerity and underinvestment mean a majority of councils now have a neighbourhood classified as one of the most deprived in the nation.
This spread of poverty has led to a sharp rise in the quantity of locations where disadvantaged and well-off residents end up living side by side. Just a few years ago, only 65 of the poorest areas adjoined one of the wealthiest. This number rose to 119 in the most recent data.
A Wall That Does More Than Separate Space
In Grimsby, the gap is the biggest in the country and painfully obvious. The wall transcends being just a symbolic divide; it causes tangible problems for daily routines.
- School runs that ought to take a quarter of an hour become an hour-long journey.
- Reaching important amenities like supermarkets, educational facilities and care homes is hindered.
- The area often sees antisocial behaviour, with reports of rubbish being dumped over the wall and other problems.
“You try to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you reside facing that,” noted one local, gesturing towards the corroded barricade.
Community Spirit Against a Backdrop of Hardship
Within a local community centre, staff stress that need does not recognise addresses. “Your postcode doesn’t necessarily indicate your level of challenge,” said chief executive Tracey Good.
Despite being placed in the most deprived 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe boasts a fierce loyalty and feeling of togetherness among its residents. Meanwhile, Scartho ranks among the most prosperous 10% overall.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This pattern is repeated across the country. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century housing development, is in the 10% most deprived of areas in England. It is closely bordered by spacious detached homes built in the 2000s that are in the wealthiest tenth for job prospects and living environment.
“They might have bigger houses, but here there’s more community,” said a long-term resident, aged 63. “It’s likely many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.”
The economic gap is evident: an typical family home costs about £275,000 on the estate, while on the other side comparable properties fetch about £410,000.
Locals speak of a tangible feeling of being overlooked. “This part of the community is neglected,” said resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “Over here our facilities have gradually disappeared, and most of the issues we face here are to do with financial hardship.”
The rise in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a portrait of an ever more segregated England, where prosperity and deprivation are frequently awkwardly close neighbours.